Making outdoor learning accessible and inclusive for children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND): A case study

Godwin, Ella, Jarvis, Lorna, Parkin, Nicola, Poortinga, Wouter, Hobson, Kersty, Stead, Mark, … Gattis, Merideth. (2025). Making outdoor learning accessible and inclusive for children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND): a case study. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 1-20,. 10.1080/14729679.2025.2601844

Field trips to nature sites can be a highlight of the school year. But for children with special educational needs and disabilities, uneven paths, noise and unfamiliar routines can get in the way. What can a site do to help every child take part?

The researchers interviewed four learning staff at three wetland centers run by WWT, a UK conservation charity that hosts about 50,000 schoolchildren a year. They used Universal Design for Learning, which means planning sessions from the start with several ways for children to take part, take in information and show what they learned.

What they found:

  1. Useful supports already existed. Centers offered shorter routes for children with mobility needs and hearing loops for deaf children. One gave blind children feathers and model beaks to handle.
  2. Preparing children helped. One center sent teachers a pre-visit guide, a map, a short video and a "social story": a simple story walking a child through what will happen and how they might feel. It also offered pre-visit tours.
  3. Pictures and signs helped children communicate. The same center used picture cards, visual timetables and activity instruction cards. Staff trained in Makaton, a simple sign-and-symbol system, saw whole classes sign "good morning" back.
  4. Staff adapted on the spot. They kept noise down, chose hands-on tasks like den building, sent a volunteer with groups needing extra help and opened quiet rooms.
  5. Schools often shared too little. Some teachers left the needs section of booking forms blank or gave vague details, making it hard to prepare.
  6. Some problems were hard to fix. Geese at a door left one autistic boy hysterical. Automatic hand dryers were loud and staff didn't know where to switch them off. Sometimes school adults answered for a child instead of letting them try.
  7. Supports were uneven. Only one center had these resources and staff training.

What this means for your practice

  • Build supports into every session. Offer quiet spaces, picture instructions and hands-on options to all groups, not only when a school flags a need. This also makes you less dependent on booking forms.
  • Send a prep pack. Include a map, a short video, a simple story of the day and an offer of a pre-visit. Mention what children will see and hear.
  • Make picture cards for each activity. One staff member suggested a pack per activity, so a child can follow instructions independently alongside classmates.
  • Follow up on bookings. One center chased every school for a pre-visit call and agreed together which activities would suit the class.
  • Offer several ways in. Use touch, sound and sight. Let children show learning through drawing, photos or talking, not just question-and-answer.
  • Know your site's triggers. Find where switches are, where birds gather and where a quiet room is before groups arrive.
  • Offer calmer sessions. One center ran quiet Saturday pond-dipping sessions with smaller groups.
  • Train the whole team. Include volunteers and front-desk staff, with skills such as Makaton and guiding blind visitors.
  • Let children try first. Invite every child to join in before deciding what they can't do.

The Bottom Line

The researchers interviewed four learning staff at three wetland centers run by the UK charity WWT about supporting visiting children with special educational needs and disabilities. Staff already used helpful tools: shorter walking routes, hearing loops, feathers and model beaks to touch, picture cards, visual timetables, and stories and videos that prepared children before a visit. But supports varied a lot between centers, and only one had trained its staff. Staff struggled when schools shared little about children's needs, and with things they couldn't easily change, like geese waiting at a door or loud hand dryers. For educators, the study shows the value of building supports into every session from the start, rather than waiting to hear about individual needs. After the study, all of the charity's centers adopted the best of these practices.