Building a co-created citizen science program with gardeners neighboring a Superfund site: The Gardenroots case study

Ramirez-Andreotta, Monica, Brusseau, Mark, Artiola, Janick, Maier, Raina, & Gandolfi, Jay. (2014). Building a co-created citizen science program with gardeners neighboring a superfund site: The Gardenroots case study. In R. Caron & J. Merrick (Eds.), Public Health: Improving Health via Inter-Professional Collaborations (pp. 183-201,). New York: Nova Science Publishers.

People who live near polluted sites often have urgent, practical questions. Official meetings tend to deliver information one way, which rarely answers what residents most want to know. Can a community and scientists find the answers together?

In 2008, a former mine and smelter in Dewey-Humboldt, Arizona, was added to Superfund, the federal government's priority list for cleanup. At a public meeting, residents asked: is it safe to eat vegetables from my garden, and how much can I eat? A university researcher offered to explore the question with them. Forty-three residents came to a 90-minute training and took home a manual and a kit of sampling supplies. Twenty-five gardeners then collected soil, water and vegetable samples over the growing season. They handed the samples in at the local university extension office. Residents posed the question, predicted what they would find, and chose where to sample and which vegetables to test. University labs analyzed the samples.

The researchers found:

  1. Everyday terms worked. At a "Results for Lunch" event, each gardener received a personal booklet with their data. It included a chart showing how many cups of each vegetable they could eat per week at different risk levels, next to recommended servings. Gardeners chose the level of risk they were comfortable with.
  2. Gardeners kept gardening, more safely. For these households, the biggest sources of arsenic were drinking water and soil swallowed by accident, for example when dust gets onto hands, food or drinks while gardening. Vegetables added comparatively little. Most gardeners said they would keep eating their vegetables but change their habits. Handouts suggested washing hands after gardening, not eating or drinking while gardening, and leaving gardening shoes outside.
  3. Curiosity grew. Gardeners asked new questions, such as whether their chickens' eggs contained arsenic. The team tested the eggs and reported back.
  4. Learning became action. The results showed that the town's public water was above the safe limit for arsenic. Gardeners alerted other households and reported the problem to state and federal officials. The state then issued the supplier seven notices of violation.
  5. Trust lasted. The partnership led to three new research projects, and two gardeners were hired onto a university field team.

The project also had limits. Some participants hoped to learn whether arsenic had harmed their health. However, the project measured arsenic in soil, water and vegetables, not health effects. The team had to keep explaining this, and it passed health questions on to university health scientists. Gardeners also could not analyze their own samples, because that needed specialist lab equipment. The team offered a tour of the university lab so gardeners could see how the analysis was done, however, the lab was about 200 miles away, and few came.

What this means for your practice:

  • Start from your community's question. Projects built around what people already want to know draw them in and keep them involved.
  • Share decisions. Let participants make predictions and choose what to sample. Testing what people actually grew kept the project relevant to everyone.
  • Make taking part easy. Offer a short hands-on training, a clear manual and a kit with every supply needed. Run extra sessions, or deliver kits, for people who miss the training. Give people a convenient local place to hand in samples. In this project, using the local extension office also helped keep samples in good condition.
  • Show up regularly. The lead researcher attended town meetings and community events at least every two months, which built trust.
  • Translate results into daily choices. "Cups per week" meant more than raw numbers. Compare results with familiar benchmarks, like recommended servings.
  • Give people their data and the choice. Sharing full personal results, and letting people decide what level of risk felt acceptable, built understanding.
  • Pair results with practical steps. Simple handouts helped gardeners keep gardening while lowering their exposure.
  • Be clear about limits from the start. Explain what your project can and cannot answer, and point people to other experts for the rest.

Return to Environmental Health Literacy eeRESEARCH collection

The Bottom Line

Residents living near a polluted former mine asked scientists a simple question: is it safe to eat vegetables from my garden? Together they set up a project in which 25 gardeners collected soil, water and vegetable samples from their own gardens. Participants learned that drinking water, and soil swallowed by accident while gardening, were bigger sources of arsenic than their vegetables. Most said they would keep eating their garden vegetables but change how they garden. Gardeners also discovered that the town's public water was over the safe limit for arsenic. They alerted their neighbors and reported the problem to officials, and the state then issued violation notices to the water supplier. For educators, the project shows how starting from a community's own question and presenting results in everyday terms can build lasting understanding and action.