Building a co-created citizen science program with gardeners neighboring a Superfund site: The Gardenroots case study

Ramirez-Andreotta, Monica, Brusseau, Mark, Artiola, Janick, Maier, Raina, & Gandolfi, Jay. (2014). Building a co-created citizen science program with gardeners neighboring a superfund site: The Gardenroots case study. In R. Caron & J. Merrick (Eds.), Public Health: Improving Health via Inter-Professional Collaborations (pp. 183-201,). New York: Nova Science Publishers.

People who live near polluted sites often have urgent, practical questions. Official meetings tend to deliver information one way, and that rarely answers what residents most want to know. Can a community and scientists find the answers together?

In 2008, a former mine and smelter in Dewey-Humboldt, Arizona, was added to "Superfund," the federal government's priority list for cleanup. At a public meeting, residents asked: is it safe to eat vegetables from my garden, and how much can I eat? A university researcher offered to explore the question with them. Forty-three residents came to a 90-minute training and took home a sampling kit and a simple manual. Twenty-five gardeners then collected soil, water and vegetable samples over the growing season and dropped them at the county extension office. Residents posed the question, predicted what they would find, and chose where to sample and which vegetables to test. University labs analyzed the samples.

The researchers found:

  1. Everyday terms worked. At a "Results for Lunch" event, each gardener received a personal booklet with their data. The booklet included a chart showing how many cups of each vegetable they could eat per week at different risk levels, next to recommended servings. Gardeners then chose the level of risk they were comfortable with.
  2. Gardeners kept gardening, more safely. For these households, drinking water and accidentally swallowing soil were bigger sources of arsenic than vegetables. Most said they would keep eating their garden vegetables but change their habits. Waterproof handouts listed simple steps, such as washing hands after gardening, not gardening on windy days and leaving gardening shoes outside.
  3. Curiosity grew. Gardeners asked new questions, such as whether their chickens' eggs contained arsenic. The team tested the eggs and reported back.
  4. Learning became action. The results showed the town's public water was above the safe limit for arsenic. Gardeners alerted other households and reported the problem to state and federal officials, and the state issued the supplier seven notices of violation. Households with private wells now say they test them regularly.
  5. Trust lasted. The partnership led to three new research projects, and two gardeners were hired onto a university field team.

The team also faced challenges. They had to keep reminding people that the project measured arsenic levels, not health effects. A lab tour about 200 miles away drew few people.

What this means for your practice:

  • Start from your community's question. Projects built around what people already want to know draw them in and keep them involved.
  • Share decisions. Let participants make predictions and choose what to sample. Testing what people actually grow kept the project relevant to everyone.
  • Make taking part easy. Offer a short hands-on training with a clear manual and a ready-made kit. Add extra sessions for people who miss the first one, and use a local drop-off point such as an extension office.
  • Show up regularly. The lead researcher attended town meetings and community events at least every two months, which built trust.
  • Translate results into daily choices. "Cups per week" meant more than raw numbers. Compare results with familiar benchmarks, like recommended servings.
  • Give people their data and the choice. Sharing full personal results and letting people decide what risk felt acceptable built understanding.
  • Pair results with practical steps. Simple handouts helped gardeners keep gardening while lowering their exposure.
  • Be clear about limits from the start. Explain what your project can and cannot answer, and point people to other experts for questions you can't cover.

The Bottom Line

Residents living near a polluted former mine asked scientists a simple question: is it safe to eat vegetables from my garden? Together they set up a project in which 25 gardeners collected soil, water and vegetable samples from their own gardens. Participants learned that drinking water and accidentally swallowing soil were bigger sources of arsenic than their vegetables. Most said they would keep eating their garden vegetables but change how they garden. Gardeners also discovered that the town's public water was over the safe limit for arsenic. They alerted their neighbors and reported the problem to officials, and the state then issued violation notices to the water supplier. For educators, the project shows how starting from a community's own question and presenting results in everyday terms can build lasting understanding and action.