Increasing fruit and vegetable intake among children and youth through gardening-based interventions: A systematic review

Savoie-Roskos, M.R., Wengreen, H., & Durward, C. (2016). Increasing fruit and vegetable intake among children and youth through gardening-based interventions: A systematic review. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2016.10.014

Most studies show that children eat more fruits and vegetables after participating in a garden-based programThe purpose of this systematic review of the literature was to identify the effectiveness of gardening programs designed to increase fruit and vegetable (F/V) consumption among children. The review included studies published in peer-reviewed journals between January 2005 and October 2015. Only studies measuring children’s F/V consumption before and after they participated in a gardening intervention program were included. Fourteen studies met these criteria.

For this review, gardening-based interventions included any programs involving outside gardens, micro-farms, container gardens, or other gardening methods allowing children to have hands-on experience with planting, growing, and harvesting fruits and/or vegetables. Programs were conducted in a variety of school, after school, and community settings. A quality assessment tool was used to measure the quality of each study included in the review.

While the reviewed studies included children between the age of 2 and 15, most the programs targeted elementary-aged students. The gardening intervention programs ranged in length from 10 weeks to 18 months and were conducted in four different countries: United States, United Kingdom, Australia, and Canada.

Ten of the 14 articles reported statistically significant increases in children’s F/V consumption after participating in a gardening intervention program. The authors caution, however, that many studies had a number of limitations, including the use of convenience samples, small sample sizes, and self-reported measurements of F/V consumption. Yet, the authors indicate that more study is warranted. Such studies, they suggest, should include control groups, randomized designs, and assessments of F/V consumption over a period of at least 1 year. The authors also suggest that gardening intervention programs would do well to include a parenting component and that future research compare the effectiveness of traditional gardening programs with intervention programs that incorporate resources and support for parents.

The Bottom Line

Most studies show that children eat more fruits and vegetables after participating in a garden-based program