eeRESEARCH combines research for environmental education and the movement to connect children and nature. The database includes multiple ways to search for articles, syntheses, and research summaries.
This project is a partnership with Children & Nature Network and NAAEE. Funded by the Pisces Foundation with support from ee360, ee360+, and the U.S. Forest Service. Learn more.
Research Partner
Research Category
Displaying 1849 - 1860 of 2031
Faulkner, G. E. J., Buliung, R. N., Flora, P. K., & Fusco, C. (2009). Active school transport, physical activity levels and body weight of children and youth: A systematic review. Preventive Medicine, 48(1), 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.10.017
Strife, S., & Downey, L. (2009). Childhood development and access to nature: A new direction for environmental inequality research. Organization & Environment, 22(1), 24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1086026609333340
Tucker, P., Irwin, J. D., Gilliland, J., He, M., Larsen, K, & Hess, P. (2009). Environmental influences on physical activity levels in youth. Health & Place, 15(1), 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.07.001
Castonguay, G, & Jutras, S. (2009). Children’s appreciation of outdoor places in a poor neighborhood. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.05.002
Skar, M., & Krogh, E. (2009). Changes in children’s nature-based experiences near home: From spontaneous play to adult-controlled, planned and organised activities. Children’s Geographies, 7(3), 16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14733280903024506
Larsen, K., Gilliland, J., Hess, P., Tucker, P., Irwin, J., & He, M. Z. (2009). The influence of the physical environment and sociodemographic characteristics on children’s mode of travel to and from school. American Journal of Public Health, 99(3), 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2008.135319
Han, K. T. (2009). Influence of limitedly visible leafy indoor plants on the psychology, behavior, and health of students at a junior high school in Taiwan. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916508314476
MacDougall, C., Schiller, W., & Darbyshire, P. (2009). What are our boundaries and where can we play? Perspectives from eight- to ten-year-old Australian metropolitan and rural children. Early Child Development and Care, 179(2), 16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03004430802667021
Dyment, J. E., Bell, A. C., & Lucas, A. J. (2009). The relationship between school ground design and intensity of physical activity. Children’s Geographies, 7(3), 16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14733280903024423
Chavez, D. J. (2009). Youth day in Los Angeles: Evaluating the role of technology in children’s nature activities. Children, Youth and Environments, 19(1), 23. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.19.1.0102
Nilsson, A., Andersen, L. B., Ommundsen, Y., Froberg, K., Sardinha, L. B., & Piehl-Aulin, K. (2009). Correlates of objectively assessed physical activity and sedentary time in children: A cross-sectional study (The European Youth Heart Study). BMC Public Health, 9(322). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-322
Blair, D. (2009). The child in the garden: An evaluative review of the benefits of school gardening. Journal of Environmental Education, 40(2), 24. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.40.2.15-38