Emotional confrontation may play an important role in addressing environmental problems

Löfström, E. ., Klöckner, C. A., & Nesvold, I. H. (2020). Nature in your face - Disruptive climate change communication and eco-visualization as part of a garden-based learning approach involving primary school children and teachers in co-creating the future. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568068

“Nature in Your Face” (NiYF) refers to a method developed and used for a workshop designed to help stakeholder groups work together in creating solutions reflecting shared values. The NiYF approach assumes that reciprocity among citizens is a key factor “in capturing the hearts and imaginations of all those who are part of the solution.”  NiYF is designed to create a shift in mindset – away from working towards solutions that avoid disrupting lifestyles “toward disruption and active work for radical changes.” Art and eco-visualizations activities used during the workshop are intentionally designed to move people out of their comfort zone and increase the possibility of identifying innovative solutions to community-based problems. Workshop activities follow a three-step process, consisting of framing, twisting, and using. “Framing” involves the introduction of a disruptive element designed to trigger an emotional reaction. “Twisting” uses creative activities to explore innovative solutions; and “using” applies the developed solutions in the local social system (or refines them further).

Two NiYF workshops were conducted with fifth-grade students in Norway as a way to field test the process. Both workshops focused on environmental problems linked to the amount of plastics used and plastic littering. A total of 86 children participated in the workshops. The “framing” process involved students in viewing photos of plastic waste in their community. After discussing related environmental problems, the students decided to use the term “nature's vomit” in reference to plastic waste. The “twisting” and “using” process involved students working in groups to identify all plastic in one of five assigned contexts (at home, in the grocery store, in the classroom, in nature, and in toys) and finding ways of eliminating all plastic they could do without or replace in their assigned context. Each group produced a poster illustrating their ideas about how to solve the problem of plastics. The children indicated a willingness to give up many of the products that are part of everyday life, including video games and game consoles.

Observations and interviews relating to the NiYF project indicate that children's understanding of plastic include eco-anxiety, denial, self-efficacy and cognitive dissonance. Children expressed frustration about having to solve problems created by earlier generations. One practical outcome of the project – suggested by the students -- was the securing of recycling units for plastic and paper in the students' classrooms.

Outcomes of the NiYF project illustrate the practical usefulness and potential of the workshop methodology. “The project marks a paradigm shift from creating knowledge to using knowledge to create action.” The NiYF approach may be effective in addressing specific pressing environmental issues and challenges.

Research Partner